CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Patrice Bail <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 2 Aug 1998 20:42:52 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Andrew Dickson wrote:
>
>   After I had written my articles I realized the columellar plaits of
> the smaller unicolored Scaphellas are more similar to the plaits
> belonging to Scaphella junonia.  I also point out that this suggests the
> subgenus of Scaphella "Clenchina" is invalid.
>   Emerson and Old belived this subgenus was trivial based on the
> comparison of radula charactaristics of S. contoyensis, S. evelina and
> S. junonia.
>
> Andrew Dickson
> [log in to unmask]
I agree.
Difference of radula between subgenus "Scaphella" and "clenchina" is too
thin and does not correspond to modern criteria. "Clenchina" drops in
synonymy and must be forsaken.
Pat Bail.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2