LISTSERV - CONCH-L Archives - LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	CONCH-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Content-Transfer-Encoding:	7bit
Sender:	Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Re: Oldest known jewelry
From:	mienis <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Sun, 10 Aug 2008 06:50:10 +0300
Content-Type:	text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-9"; reply-type=original
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (30 lines)

Dear Umit,
They are indeed older than the shell beads from Blombos, but younger than
those reported from Skhul (see Science, 312: 1785-1788. 23 June 2006).
Regards, Henk K. Mienis

----- Original Message -----
From: "Umit Kebap??" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, August 10, 2008 6:31 AM
Subject: [CONCH-L] Oldest known jewelry


>
> I dont remember any remark on the new documentation (see the link) before
> here. To the site new find (a year ago indeed) predates S African cave
> shells.
> See:
>
> http://africascience.blogspot.com/2007/07/oldest-jewelry-found-in-morocco-
> cave.html
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.UGA.EDU