Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 4 Nov 1998 00:11:44 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I was under the impression that a sub-species cannot exist in the same
habitat as the parent species? maybe one of our esteemed malocologists
will shed some light on the topic? , mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Eichhorst <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Tuesday, November 03, 1998 9:30 PM
Subject: Re: Internet Message
>Mark,
>
>I do not understand why a subspecies should not exist in the same habitat,
area,
>locale, or whatever as the parent species. The very finches you talk about
on
>the Galapagos exist side by side; species to subspecies. Some
interbreeding
>goes on but for the most part each group selects within its own group.
Each
>group tends to exploit a different niche within the environment. So while
they
>may live side by side; they eat different seeds, nest in different areas,
etc.
>
>What do you think?
>
>Tom Eichhorst in New Mexico, USA
>
|
|
|