CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Jan 2014 16:31:40 +0100
Reply-To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
From:
Olivier CARO <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
I hope you friends will slate this article on your twitter and facebook
accounts, with selected hashtags.

Le 14/01/2014 16:25, Ed and Susan a écrit :
> One extremely ridiculous thing is that the authors say in the title that the
> ³clams² are vanishing, but... they never looked at ANY clams!  Live clams
> were right there in the intertidal zone and could easily have been sampled
> quantitatively during especially low tides using a standard scoop, corer or
> grab, but no attempt was made to do that. Instead, being paleontologists,
> the authors looked only at empty valves in the beach drift. But to say
> anything at all about live clams, you need to look at live clams! Why on
> earth would you count valves in the beach drift when instead you could count
> live clams in their habitat?
>
> Susan J. Hewitt
> NYC

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2