CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
QUESTION
From:
Barbara Haviland <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 28 Jan 1998 16:52:55 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
A follow up just in case a didn't do this it right the first time. Ed wants
to know: can any pecten lover out there reliably separate Decatopecten
plica (L. 1758), suplicatus (Sow. II 1842), velutinus (Sow. II 1842),
striatus (Schumacher 1817).
 
My mentor, Henk Dijkstra says that though there is an ongoing study on
them, he feels they are all plica.  Agreement? Disagreement?
 
Would like to hear what you have to say.
 
Ed Haviland

ATOM RSS1 RSS2