CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Erick Staal <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 7 Jan 1999 05:01:28 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
Some sources are more precise than others. I'm almost certain that in
malacology there is in that period only one Gould and thats Augustus
Addison. Sometimes however, christian names (or numbers) are necessary to
correctly identify an author, e.g. Adams (A. & C.B.) or Sowerby (George
Brettingham I, II and III).
 
Erick
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Aaron Baldwin <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Thursday, January 07, 1999 4:42 AM
Subject: Author question
 
 
>Dear Conch-lers,
>
>I had a question about authors that I hoped some of you could answer. In
>searching through checklists of Pacific mollusks, I repeatedly run into the
>author name "Gould." such as Pucturella galeata (Gould, 1846). I also run
>into the author name "A.A. Gould,"  such as Patinopecten caurinus (A.A.
>Gould, 1850)
>
>Are these Goulds one and the same? If so, why the different formalities?
>Thank you- Aaron
>Aaron Baldwin
>[log in to unmask]
>[log in to unmask]
>http://www.ofseaandshore.com
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2