CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Genus Taxonomy
From:
Ankistro Desmus <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 15 Mar 1999 15:41:40 EST
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Content-type:
text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (7 lines) 
In a message dated 3/15/99 1:49:28 PM EST, [log in to unmask] writes:
 
> Collisella pelta
 
Uh ohhh... for this species, I thought the genus was Lottia with Collisella
being the subgenus.  Is Lottia now obsolete?

ATOM RSS1 RSS2