Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:11:00 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I have to agree. Often I watch for responses to questions from other
members. To no avail. Responses are sent privately. This takes the joy
out of the site.
Carol Lowe
----------
> From: Monika Forner <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: Isla Margarita
> Date: March 03, 1998 1:05 PM
>
> Hi everybody:
>
> Would it be possible to make the default for answers to questions like
this
> one NOT the private e-mail address of the questioner but address answers
> to such inquiries to the whole group, please? I had been waiting for
> answers to the San Blas Islands question (and to may other similar ones
in
> the past) eagerly and for a long time; it's always interesting to hear
> about shelling spots ANYWHERE, at least to me. When no answers came, I
> just thought nobody had an answer; it didn't even occur to me that people
> would answer privately. Isn't a question like this part and parcel of
what
> Conch-L is all about? I don't mind answers to flying pigs in public, in
> fact I enjoy them, but I DO regret to think that answers to questions of
> general shelling interest are provided in private. Maybe I'm off here,
but
> would anybody really mind receiving such info, even if they personally
> didn't ask for it?
>
> Monika
|
|
|