CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kay Lavalier <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 23 Jan 2000 06:29:31 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Andrew Vik
[log in to unmask]

Dear Patty:

Actually, I don't have either species in my possession. I just noticed the
spelling discrepancies and was wondering which was correct.

Yours, Andrew V.

Patty Jansen wrote:

> I very much agree with Kevin. I have seen the type of this shell, and it's
> label says Benthastelena katherina (because that is the only species in
> this genus). Now that intrigues me even more. Because it is not a very
> common species from deep water. Are you sure that's what you have Andrew?
> Because there is a species Corastele allanae, which looks rather like
> Benthastelena katherina, but is much more colourful, from shallower water,
> and also much more common
>
> Patty
> WWW: http://www.capricornica.com
>
> Capricornica Publications               on-line natural history bookshop
> P.O. Box 345
> Lindfield NSW 2070
> Australia
>
> phone/fax: 02 9415 8098 international: +61 2 9415 8098
> mobile 0412 865030
>
> E-mail: [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2