CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bruce Osterberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 20 Feb 2000 18:18:13 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (46 lines)
Good Evening:

My Name is Bruce Osterberg,  and I live in Antioch, IL.  I have been
collecting shells for several years, and now it time to start cataloging
them.  I have been writing down everything about them,  but now that I have
access and excel.  I was wondering if anyone knows a good program for
cataloging shells?  I liik forward to the interaction with this group.  I am
especially interested in Conus.

Bruce
----- Original Message -----
From: <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2000 6:11 PM
Subject: Re: Genus for our Lion's Paw


> In a message dated 02/18/2000 3:29:49 PM EST,
> [log in to unmask] writes:
>
> <<
>  Dear Linda,
>
>  Carole Marshall's article entitled " Recent Changes in the Pectinidae
Part
>  2"  'American Conchologist Vol 23 (3)  September 1995 covers the points
that
>  you have raised extremely well.
>
>  Stanley Francis. >>
>
> Dear All,
>   Since Stanley brought up my previous articles, I have to say there were
two
> errors in part 2, one of the shells has been misnamed. I looked it up and
it
> was tehuelchus. Old name was correct, but the new name they had as
Nodipecten
> fragosus and it should have been Lindapecten tehuelchus. Second error,
> Bractechlamys was misspelled as Brachtechlamys. Misspelled so much in the
old
> literature and unfortunately perpetuated in my article.
>           Carole
> P.S. Stanley, how did you do with your display at the shell show?
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2