LISTSERV - CONCH-L Archives - LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	CONCH-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Show All Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Subject:	Re: P.S. on Amphidromus
From:	"M. J. Faber" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:	Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2003 21:35:36 +0200
Content-Type:	text/plain
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (24 lines)

Sherborn (Index Animalium p. 2577) cites "Bulimus furcillatus". This makes
sense, since there is a latin word furcilla (a little fork) whereas
"fucilla" does not mean a thing. Besides, there are a few other species with
the specific epithet furcillatus -a, -um, and no "fucillata" whatsoever.


Marien
www.mollus.nl

----- Original Message -----
From: "lindawbush" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 8:40 PM
Subject: P.S. on Amphidromus


> Sorry!
>
> I should have given the author and date on the Amphidromus
> furcillatus or fucilliatus; it is (Mousson, 1849).
>
> Thanks,
> Linda

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.UGA.EDU