CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Edward T. Schelling" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Jul 1998 09:13:18 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Dear Dave,
        As a dealer who already voiced his opinion in public over this matter,
I read your  letter to the COA membership very carefully.  I greatly respect a
person who stands up for what he feels is "right".  In this case, if Len's COA
membership is truely good through Dec. of 1998, then I feel that "right" is
being served.  Like myself, I am sure that Len considered his business a part
of himself and as such, his name and his business is to be considered a member
until the end of the year...therefore, his business has every right to be
represented at the COA.  I do feel that our officers and members in general
need to readdress this point in the "Guidelines", to prevent future
misunderstandings of this nature.  We might even want to consider putting more
of the "Guidelines" into the "Rules".  "Guidelines" are hard to enforce,
whereas "Rules" are easier to "follow"!"   Until such time, I have changed my
opinion about this matter.  I feel that Linda (Koestel) Convention Chairman
made the correct decision in the very difficult position that she was placed
in.  As a dealer, you folks have my support in this matter.
        Sincerely,
         Edward T. Schelling [worldwide Specimen Shells]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2