CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kurt Auffenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 26 Jan 1998 14:42:36 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
I think we have to look at the defense mechanisms of the other species in
question as well the foraging habits of the LOCAL predators.
 
Kurt
 
At 02:33 PM 1/26/98 -0500, you wrote:
>Protection from being swallowed does seem an obvious explanation for
>the various types of armament seen on gastropod shells, but - if that
>is the reason for such projections then:
>1.  Why are such projections so rare in bivalves?
>2.  Why are spines and flutes found primarily on those bivalves that
>are LEAST likely to be swallowed (sessile types like Spondylus,
>massive types like Tridacna)?
>3.  Why don't non-spiny gastropods living in the same habitat with
>the spiny types get wiped out by predators through selective
>predation (Murex capucinus among Murex cichoreus for example, or
>Murex trunculus among Murex brandaris).  Do the "smoothies" have some
>other, equally effective form of protection?
>4.  Why are various modern gastropods (Cypraeidae, Strombidae, etc.)
>LESS spiny than their extinct ancestors?
>Too tired to proffer any possible answers today, so thought I'd just
>toss a few more questions into the fray.
>
>Paul M.
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2