CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Kurt Auffenberg <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Jul 1999 11:28:33 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Emilio,
Yes, it would be a biased decision based on beauty.  Not 'collection bias'
as it is usually used.  Collection bias is when you purposefully or because
of your collection techniques or search image only collect a certain
portion of the population variation.

A holotype should be chosen to most perfectly represent the species or
subspecies.  As close to the middle of the bell curve as possible.  Of
course, this can only be done when you have a decent sample size.  This is
not always possible.

Kurt


>Is this considered collection bias? Many collections would then only
>contain specimens as close as possible to the types but not the majority
>of the population.\

>Emilio Jorge Power
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2