Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 7 Jul 2000 16:22:50 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
As a collector who has tried to follow up on Dr. Petuch's "new species" (the
living ones at least), I can tell you firsthand, Andrew is right on the
money!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew K. Rindsberg" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Friday, July 07, 2000 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: Plio-Pleistocene of southern Florida
> An anonymous person at BARBARA AIGE AIGEN [[log in to unmask]] writes:
> " Overall I feel that Petuch made a very valuable addition to our
> understanding of the Florida Plio-Pleistocene, and that the fossils he
> named must be taken seriously and not dismissed without the sort of
> studies that his detractors wanted him to do."
>
> That is exactly the problem. Sloppy work takes more time to critique than
it
> is worth. Whether the species and subspecies exist is really not the point
> here. The fact is that many of these new taxa are unrecognizable and
> unlocatable. Evaluating such work puts such a huge burden on later
> researchers (and on private collectors, too!) that many people now prefer
to
> work elsewhere rather than deal with the mess. Life is too short to spend
> measuring other people's shells for them.
>
> People who aren't willing to spend the time for adequate taxonomy and
> stratigraphy should not expect praise for their work!
>
> Andrew K. Rindsberg
> Geological Survey of Alabama
>
|
|
|