Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 4 Aug 2001 10:42:14 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854";
x-mac-creator="4D4F5353" |
Organization: |
Winston Barney Orchestra |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Dear Henk,
Which came first , the Latin lego / lectus or the Greek lego ? They both mean
the same thing .
Winston Barney
Fort Worth, Tx
Henk and Zvia Mienis wrote:
> This subject has been treated already several times on the ConchL-Net.
> Try out the archives!
> Leg. is Latin and means collected by.
> The indication coll. on a label means either collected by or the collection
> of,
> which are two different things. Coll. H.K. Mienis may contain material
> collected by numerous other people i.e. leg. J. Wolff /leg. W. Barney/leg.
> T. Eichhorst, etc.
> In order to avoid mistakes Leg. is used to indicate the collector on labels,
> while Col. is used to indicate the owner of the collection.
> Best regards,
> Henk K. Mienis
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 11:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Shell labels
>
> > I believe "leg" comes from the Greek "lego" which means to gather
> (collect) or
> > select.
> >
> > Winston Barney
> > Fort Worth, Tx
> >
> > John Wolff wrote:
> >
> > > More word questions...
> > >
> > > What is the best way to indicate the name of the collector on a shell
> label?
> > > I have been using "Leg.", but was hard-pressed to explain what it stands
> > > for when questioned. Could not find it in a dictionary. Is there a
> better way?
> > >
> > > John Wolff
> > > 2640 Breezewood Dr.
> > > Lancaster, PA 17601
|
|
|