Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 1 Jun 2002 23:44:05 +0200 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hello Ross ! Are we the only two interested in Harpidae ??? To me Harpa
goodwini Rehder , 1993 is nothing but a very large geographical variant of
Harpa kajiyamai Habe in Habe and Kosuge , 1970 . Nobody will ever know why
Rehder , who had also described the latter in 1973 , did not compare his
1993 "new "species with Harpa kajiyamai .According to me Harpa kajiyamai and
Harpa goodwini are identical since they only differ by the size . Franck
Frydman
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ross Mayhew" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 8:15 PM
Subject: Oops!! Harpa goodwini Rehder, 1993
> I'm REALLY good at making myself look stupid! The beast in question is
> actually Harpa goodwini Rehder, 1993 - and i guess the question would be
> is this generally recognized as a full species, or has it since been
> relegated to being a subspecies or regional form of another Harpa,
> seeing how variable members of the genus are.
>
> -JR
|
|
|