Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 25 Feb 2003 23:28:06 +0100 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
multipart/mixed; x-avg-checked=avg-ok-2DBE7523;
boundary="=======6D8C1A9F=======" |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I would recomend 10x binocular microscope for most uses with microshells
like sorting sand samples and identification.
It is sometimes useful to have a more powerful lens, like a 20x for
observing better sculpture or protoconch. This magnification can usually
be achieved by a supplemental pair of oculars.
At higher magnification (30x 40x) you can see bigger, but generally the
area with focus is extremely small. I have this magnification in my
binocular but hardly ever use it. More than 40x is in my opinion useless if
you do not have high quality lenses (read: very expensive).
Best regards,
Paolo
At 19.44 24/02/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear Conch-Lers: I had a great time visiting the event yesterday & was
>especially impressed with Peggy Williams exhibit of microshells
>collected from the high tide line near the pier @ Sanibel Island. It was
>such a wonder to see how many species she identified from such a small
>amount of sand & shell collected. I'm interested in knowing what
>reference guides deal with identifying microshells & what power
>microscopes/loupes are recommended for studying these often overlooked
>shells. I was in the jewelry business & have a 10x loupe & identified
>exotic fruit flies with the Medfly Emergency Program with the USDA and
>have a 15x hand lens from that program. Please advise me about this
>fascinating realm of conchology/malacology if you have any ideas to
>share. Christopher Stalder, email:[log in to unmask]
Paolo G. ALBANO
Bologna, ITALY
E-mail: [log in to unmask]
Homepage: http://members.xoom.virgilio.it/pgalbano/index.htm
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.445 / Virus Database: 250 - Release Date: 21/01/2003
|
|
|