Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 22 Aug 2003 10:48:54 +1200 |
In-Reply-To: |
<a05100300bb6b232e2600@[68.35.251.19]> |
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>I hope you are all set for a relaxing weekend. Concerning the
>discussions regarding digital cameras, I am constantly amazed by what
>people put up on eBay,
What bugs me is the price variation from dealer to dealer in the US.
The Coolpix 5700 can be had for as little as $615, but you can pay up
to $1199 for the same basic kit!! www.bizrate.com and similar sites
can find you the cheap prices, with dealer feedback.
>I'm currently using a Minolta Dimage 7 (5.24MP) and while it is
>capable of producing excellent images, more often than not, the auto
>focus takes a ridiculously long time to work and inevitably the shots
>need a good deal of Photoshop tweaking to be useable. The newer
>Dimage 7Hi is far superior, as Minolta has been great about
>responding to user feedback.
I was looking at the Sony Cybershot DSC-F717 (best resolution in the
class, 5.24Mp), but it needs Sony-only memory sticks ($$). Olympus,
Canon, Pentax make no equivalent with a decent resolution. Minolta
makes 2 cameras with excellent reviews, but they are not
learner-friendly and eat batteries at a horrific rate. The only other
option was the Coolpix; its disadvantage is only 5.0Mp resolution.
--
Andrew Grebneff
Dunedin, New Zealand
64 (3) 473-8863
<[log in to unmask]>
Fossil preparator
Seashell, Macintosh & VW/Toyota van nut
I want your sinistral gastropods!
-----------------------
Q: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
A: Why is top posting frowned upon?
|
|
|