Sender: |
|
Date: |
Sat, 31 Jul 2004 11:39:48 +0200 |
Reply-To: |
|
Subject: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
8bit |
In-Reply-To: |
<f05100306bd30e3801e33@[218.101.117.138]> |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
From: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Well, that settles it. ASAP ALL scientifically important collections
> must be moved together to the geologically stable center of a major
> continent, in an area free of savage storms (tornadoes), and housed
> in an asteroidproof construction.
> I suggest the northern prairie of central Canada; Siberia is too
> unstable culturally/politically.
Hi Andrew,
Besides, Siberia is not asteroid-safe. OK, nowhere is, but remember Tunguska
blast in 1908?
Central Canada-Hmm, due to changing climate severe storms travel more and
more farther north...
What about moving collections in NORAD command center, 1km deep in granite?
Milan
____________________
http://www.email.si/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|