Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 1 Nov 2004 21:27:08 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Tom, I appreciated you correcting me and did not mean that in a bad manner.
I wanted anyone to read it that you helped me to correct the species. Let us
hope that we get an answer.
Linda Brunner just wrote to me and said that I she had me on conch-l
noreview. She changed it so that is something new to me.
Thanks again, Phyllis
[log in to unmask]
> Hey Phyllis.
>
> I really didn't mean to correct anyone. I just responded with the name I
> know, because I was also curious about the attached sponge or bryozoan or
> whatever. Frankly, I did not notice use of X pallida instead of X
> pallidula. Such errors slip in all the time, thus the Compendium has
> Neritina puncticulata Lamarck, 1816 instead of the original spelling by
> Lamarck as punctulata.
>
> I have been a Xenophora fan for a long time and finally getting the chance
> to obtain X lamberti at this last COA convention was a real treat. And it
> was all because Doris Underwood knew I was interested and let me know the
> folks from new Caledonia had some specimens. Now I just have to wait for
> that Hawaiian endemic to show up.
>
> Tom E.
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|