CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Terry S. Arnold" <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 10 Sep 1998 21:18:11 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Its usage, at least in paleontology, is cf. xyz which should be read as
compares favorably to xyz. This usually means that sp. cf. xyz is closest to
xyz but for some reason (usually poor preservation) an exact species
assignment
cannot be supported.
 
A related terms is sp. aff. xyz which means the specimen is closest to xyz but
appears to be distinct from xyz.
 
I hope this clarifies the issue.
 
Terry
 
At 08:27 PM 9/10/1998 , Scott E Jordan wrote in flowing prose:
>
> Hello Gang,
>
> Can someone explain the meaning of "sp. cf." used in the context of
> explaining an unidentified species or form?
>
> Regards,
>
> Scott Jordan
 
 
 
Terry S. Arnold 2975 B Street San Diego, CA 92102 USA
[log in to unmask] (619) 235-8181 (voice) (619) 235-0016 (fax)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2