Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Thu, 12 Nov 1998 20:35:52 -0700 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Martin,
I sent you a message trying to help with your identification. I stuck with Walls
and C. connectens but, in the end with some of these you just have to take your
choice. I did not and do not feel slighted because I got no response. First the
list has had its troubles lately - as everyone should have noticed and secondly,
you asked a question and responded to one of the answers (the only one you got for
a while). But whatever, I really don't think anyone was actually upset. Just
assume the poke in the eye was meant humorously, a bit of tongue in the cheek.
Life is way too short to worry about who answers what message.
Come on folks, lets lighten up.
Tom Eichhorst in New Mexico, USA
Martin E. Tremor, Jr. wrote:
> I want to apologize for what would appear to be a deliberate slight to any of
> you out there who respond to request for help that I posted a few days ago.
> For what ever reason ...when I sent a Thank you to only one person it was
> because it was the only response I had at that time. I never meant to slight
> anyone for I am grateful to anyone who takes the time to share their expertise
> with me. I have sent personal messages to two persons that I know were
> slighted, however there are more I am sure that I don't know about. It is to
> those "unknowns" that this apology is sent. I am very sorry.
>
> Martin
|
|
|