Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Mon, 30 Nov 1998 07:13:00 -0000 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I agree with Ross on this one as nobilis is hard to find , I haven't a clue
as to why though I would guess that it's like the yellow generalis being
that it's so common that it's unprofitable to sell.
As to the question of the two subspecies ; Conus nobilis renatae Cailliez,
1993 and Conus nobilis friedae da Motta, 1991 I don't see much mention of
either except in Da Motta's book on classification and this is not a book
for identification but more of a guide as to where the form of a particular
conus falls into.
Generally if Tom Rice doesn't list the shell in the price guide then it's
either relatively new or it's not recognized as a separate subspecies .
They only look like slight color forms and even that's a
stretch.....ferreter
It seems that "normal" Conus nobilis is also a tough cusomer to find-
>i keep asking and asking, but all anyone comes up with are those fancy
>skinneri things- you can have those by the dozen for outrageous prices,
>but the supposedly common $10 nobilis nobilis is scarcer than the
>proverbial honest polititian- anybody know why???
>
>
>Curious in Canada,
>
>-Ross M.
>
|
|
|