CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 30 May 1999 20:32:42 PDT
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
AW: Re: The Question Man
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
In-Reply-To:
<[log in to unmask]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; X-MAPIextension=".TXT"
From:
Helmut Nisters <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
Just a surprise. But the surprise would be bigger if he would have
from this half only a broken half, again less than this half. What
would be then.
The Answer Man from Innsbruck
----------
At 03:11 PM 5/28/99 -0700, you wrote:
>Just a little something to broil your minds with between burgers and hot
>dogs.
>        How many shells ARE known from the description of ONE example ONLY?
>Sowerby's Ep. dubia might give you a start.
>        Q-Man
>
>
 
I don't know, but Petuch has the dubious distinction of having a new species
known from LESS than one shell: Truncaria lindae (surprise).
 
G. Thomas Watters
Ohio Biological Survey &
Aquatic Ecology Laboratory
Ohio State University
1315 Kinnear Road
Columbus, OH  USA
v: 614-292-6170
f: 614-292-0181

ATOM RSS1 RSS2