CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Travis Payne <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 17 Jun 1998 11:25:28 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
Hi Andy,
 
I'd like a good answer to that, too.  Pectens can be as confusing as anything,
and they are constantly getting tossed from one genus to another.  Are
Annachlamys, Belchlamys, Coralichlamys Scaeochlamys, and others, considered
full genera, or are they subgenera of Chlamys?  I even heard that someone
suggested Gloripallium pallium and G. speciosum were one in the same.  Seems
ludicrous to me, if it is true.
 
Travis

ATOM RSS1 RSS2