CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Gijs C. Kronenberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 19 Mar 1999 14:21:07 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (36 lines)
Hi Emilio,
 
And the last part of your reply is not true, that is, not yet! Read the
ICZN code.
 
Gijs, (by accident) the Netherlands
 
----------
> Van: ejpower <[log in to unmask]>
> Aan: [log in to unmask]
> Onderwerp: Re: Genus Taxonomy
> Datum: dinsdag 16 maart 1999 15:18
>
> Cadee M.C. wrote:
> cut....
> > Therefore publication of new species on Internet must be rejected,
there are
> > no referees nor an editor for critically reading of the manuscript.
> >
> > Martin Cadee, the Netherlands
> Hello!
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> This totally un-true. A website on the internet CAN HAVE editors and
> peer reviewers prior to publication of any new species description or
> any other scientific research paper. I also think that this methodology
> for publication is proposed or is valid IF you also place some sort of
> electronic media (disk or CD) with at least 10 institutions.
>
> In time the net will rule!!!!
>
> Later,
>
> Emilio Jorge Power

ATOM RSS1 RSS2