LISTSERV - CONCH-L Archives - LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

	LISTSERV Archives
	CONCH-L Home

	Log In
	Register

	Subscribe or Unsubscribe

	Search Archives

Options:	Use Forum View Use Monospaced Font Show Text Part by Default Condense Mail Headers
Message:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author:	[<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Sender:	Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:	Genus for our Lio's Paw
From:	Linda Bush <[log in to unmask]>
Date:	Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:36:08 -0600
Organization:	Charter Communications
Reply-To:	Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:	text/plain (7 lines)

Hi, everyone!

        I have noticed lately that some malacologists and conchologist are using  "Nodipecten nodosus" instead of "Lyropecten nodosus."  But one leaves "antillarum" in the Lyropecten genus.  What is correct, and does this have to do with the fact that fossil, knobby Pectenidae are labelled "Nodipecten?"

        Thanks in advance,
                        Linda

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

LISTSERV.UGA.EDU