 
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Thu, 16 Mar 2000 10:21:08 -0500 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
According to "Illustrated Catalogue of Latiaxis and its Related Groups",
Kosuge & Suzuki, it should read Coralliophila abnormis (Smith, 1878).
John Jacobs
Seffner, FL
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: Art Weil <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 9:39 PM
Subject: (no subject)
Dear Someone.
In Rices Prices, he lists "abnormalis E.A. Smith" under
Coralliophila. Under Latiaxis, he lists "abnormis E.A. Smith" (same
date). I think they are the same shell. Which is the correct spelling?
Oh, yes, and by the way, the Buzzards returned to Hinckley
today---right on time. Can the suipteridae (flying Pigs) be far behind?
Art
|
|
|
