CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 7 Jul 2000 13:05:27 -0500
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
"Andrew K. Rindsberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
Resent-From: [log in to unmask] Originally-From: "Andrew Rindsberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Thank you, David, for an informative and thoughtful reply. I apologize to
everyone for the ad-hominem tone of my previous message.

This might be a good place to say more generally that "amateur" and
"professional" researchers are treated alike when they name new genera and
species. There are no special allowances made for ignorance, inexperience,
or lack of resources. Or indeed for a professor's need to publish papers
quickly in order to gain tenure. We must all try for the highest standards
of which we are capable.

Andrew K. Rindsberg
Geological Survey of Alabama

ATOM RSS1 RSS2