CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 6 Oct 2000 11:19:40 -0500
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
"Andrew K. Rindsberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
Resent-From: [log in to unmask] Originally-From: "Andrew Rindsberg" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
David Campbell wrote, "Identifying which cones are hazardous has a couple of
major problems, in addition to the fact that direct experiments are
unethical."

Hmm. Direct experimentation hadn't occurred to me before, but now you've
filled my mind with thoughts of the people I would volunteer as guinea pigs.
Their faces terrified, or perhaps merely resigned or even quizzical, as the
cone -- fatal, allergenic, or harmless? -- approaches them in their
water-filled cages. Yes. Thank you, David.

Andy

Andrew K. Rindsberg
Geological Survey of Alabama

ATOM RSS1 RSS2