 
| Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Fri, 6 Oct 2000 23:47:07 +1000 |
| Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
| MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Andy,
You are really sick :)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew K. Rindsberg" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Saturday, October 07, 2000 2:19 AM
Subject: Re: mollusca Cone snail toxin question
> David Campbell wrote, "Identifying which cones are hazardous has a couple
of
> major problems, in addition to the fact that direct experiments are
> unethical."
>
> Hmm. Direct experimentation hadn't occurred to me before, but now you've
> filled my mind with thoughts of the people I would volunteer as guinea
pigs.
> Their faces terrified, or perhaps merely resigned or even quizzical, as
the
> cone -- fatal, allergenic, or harmless? -- approaches them in their
> water-filled cages. Yes. Thank you, David.
>
> Andy
>
> Andrew K. Rindsberg
> Geological Survey of Alabama
>
|
|
|
