CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
scanners
From:
David Kirsh <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Nov 2000 22:07:32 -0800
Content-type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Mime-version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
For those of you who have scanned shells directly,

Does anyone have an idea whether I will be able to scan smaller shells with
a scanner of higher resolution?

Someone mentioned good results with a 1200 dpi scanner for shells 5mm in
size. Will a higher end scanner be adequate for shells smaller than that?

Are there any images on the web I can look at for scanners at 1200dpi--and
at 2400dpi?

Any info will be much appreciated.

David Kirsh
Durham, NC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2