CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Mime-version:
1.0
Date:
Sat, 13 Jan 2001 00:03:56 -0800
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject:
From:
David Kirsh <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Dear Myron,

You raise a good question, but I don't think there's a hard and fast rule.

I use my judgment about whether my reply to a message has enough context for
someone to understand what I'm referring to.

I delete the original message if there's one clear subject matter indicated
in the subject line. If not, I include the original message so that someone
reading my message can see what it's about. Sometimes the message being
responded to occurred a while ago or in a flurry of other threads. I find it
useful to glance at preceding messages to get the context of the current
message.

SHELL-RELATED QUESTION: Anyone know whether Nannodiella vespuciana and N.
oxytata are still considered synonymous?

David Kirsh
Durham, NC

ATOM RSS1 RSS2