CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Date:
Mon, 12 Nov 2001 05:01:13 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
Rutland never described a Calliostoma vicentae. He dispatched samples with
this manuscript name to numerous correpondents. It turned out to be the same
species as Callumbonella suturale (Philippi).

Henk K. Mienis

[log in to unmask]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carlos Afonso" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:33 AM
Subject: FW:Calliostoma vicentae /Callumbonella suturale


> Dear friends,
>
> A colleague of mine is looking for an article of
> Rutland, 19?? dealing with Calliostoma vicentae for a
> work he is doing on Callumbonella suturale. With only
> this pour data, hope there is some that can help him
> out with the complete reference.
> Best regards to all,
>
> Carlos (Algarve, South Portugal)
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Find a job, post your resume.
> http://careers.yahoo.com
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2