Dear William and others,

A shell collection of high quality must not mean only
expensive shells and of gem quality. A high quality
collection should be well documentated with a good
systematics and good databases full of datas and maybe
a good overview to many families. A hig quality
collection also could be a collection of one family
only to see all the differences in variabilty.
more later
with best regards
Sieglinde


--- William Corey <[log in to unmask]> schrieb: > I have a
simple and basic question and one, for
> which, there are many
> answers: I would like to hear some opinions about
> "What constitutes a shell
> collection of high quality."  Put another way:  " If
> you were going to
> rebuild your collection from nothing and wanted to
> develop a collection of
> merit, what would be your ideal?
>
>              Wil

__________________________________________________________________

Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
Ihre E-Mail noch individueller? - http://domains.yahoo.de