CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 2 Apr 2002 15:13:33 -0700
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From:
"Thomas E. Eichhorst" <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Linda,

I believe the common consensus is that the piscivorous (fish eating) cones
are the dangerous ones to man.  I have seen a deadly seven list as well as a
deadly five list.  From Halstead, Bruce W., 1959.  Dangerous Marine Animals,
comes the following (p. 39):

C. aulicus
C. geographicus
C. marmoreus
C. striatus
C. textile (molluscivorous - has to be an exception to every rule)
C. tulipa

I guess this is a deadly six list.  The problem is a lot of the evidence is
anecdotal.  For a better read on venomous cones and their effetc on man read
Dr Harry Lee's three part series on the Jacksonville Shell Club Web page.
Part three of the series deals with cones:
http://www.jaxshells.org/mollusk3.htm

Good luck,

Tom Eichhorst in New Mexico (USA)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2