>Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:13:25 +1200
>To: Mail Delivery Subsystem <[log in to unmask]>
>From: Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
>Subject: Will Ritter again...
>Cc:
>Bcc:
>X-Attachments:
>
>>Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>>Content-language: EN-US
>>
>>This report relates to a message you sent with the following header fields:
>>
>> Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Received: from tcp-daemon.smtp1.clear.net.nz by smtp1.clear.net.nz
>> (CLEAR Net Mail) id <[log in to unmask]>
>> (original mail from [log in to unmask]); Thu,
>> 27 Jun 2002 23:01:18 +1200 (NZST)
>> Received: from [203.167.180.14]
>> (203-167-180-14.dialup.clear.net.nz [203.167.180.14])
>> by smtp1.clear.net.nz (CLEAR Net Mail)
>> with ESMTP id <[log in to unmask]> for
>>[log in to unmask];
>> Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:01:17 +1200 (NZST)
>> Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:00:18 +1200
>> From: Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
>> Subject: pacifier bastards
>> X-Sender: [log in to unmask] (Unverified)
>> To: Willie Ritter <[log in to unmask]>
>> Message-id: <f05100300b940564ff635@[203.167.180.45]>
>> MIME-version: 1.0
>> Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
>>
>>Your message cannot be delivered to the following recipients:
>>
>> Recipient address: [log in to unmask]
>> Reason: Server rejected MAIL FROM address.
>> Diagnostic code: smtp;553 5.3.0 5.7.1 - Access Denied - Open Relay
>> Remote system: dns;eclipse.pacifier.com
>>(TCP|203.97.33.27|37965|199.2.117.78|25)
>>
>>
>>Reporting-MTA: dns;smtp1.clear.net.nz (tcp-daemon)
>>
>>Original-recipient: rfc822;[log in to unmask]
>>Final-recipient: rfc822;[log in to unmask]
>>Action: failed
>>Status: 5.0.0 (Server rejected MAIL FROM address.)
>>Remote-MTA: dns;eclipse.pacifier.com (TCP|203.97.33.27|37965|199.2.117.78|25)
>>Diagnostic-code: smtp;553 5.3.0 5.7.1 - Access Denied - Open Relay
>>
>>Return-path: <[log in to unmask]>
>>Received: from tcp-daemon.smtp1.clear.net.nz by smtp1.clear.net.nz
>> (CLEAR Net Mail) id <[log in to unmask]>
>> (original mail from [log in to unmask]); Thu,
>> 27 Jun 2002 23:01:18 +1200 (NZST)
>>Received: from [203.167.180.14]
>> (203-167-180-14.dialup.clear.net.nz [203.167.180.14])
>> by smtp1.clear.net.nz (CLEAR Net Mail)
>> with ESMTP id <[log in to unmask]> for [log in to unmask];
>> Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:01:17 +1200 (NZST)
>>Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 23:00:18 +1200
>>From: Andrew Grebneff <[log in to unmask]>
>>Subject: pacifier bastards
>>X-Sender: [log in to unmask] (Unverified)
>>To: Willie Ritter <[log in to unmask]>
>>Message-id: <f05100300b940564ff635@[203.167.180.45]>
>>MIME-version: 1.0
>>Content-type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii
>>
>>Will, those pacifier jerks are at it AGAIN, all right. Tried to
>>send this to you 4 times. So, rather than bother RJM, I put it over
>>the list.
>>
>>>
>>>This is the SECOND time this sort of thing has happened. Why is
>>>this going on? There is NO reason for it. NO other server does
>>>this.
>>>
>>>It happened when I was using another ISP (Xtra). The problem was
>>>cleared up, how I'm not sure. Now I've changed to another ISP...
>>>and it starts again!
>>>
>>>Clear Net is a normal ISP. Stonebow is my UNIVERSITY server. I use
>>>my e-mail program from home to access my stonebow account. This is
>>>NORMAL.
>>>
>>>Clear this up! Are you still using those criminals at Dorkslayer??
>>>>>Hi Will
>>>>>
>>>>>>You lost me re Yuri Kantor and the Melapium -- we have discussed this
>>>>>>before? Did I skip that class?
>>>>>
>>>>>I was probably just rambling about something which has caught my
>>>>>attention, having just bought several Melapium from Werner at
>>>>>rather cheap prices (well, these things are normally
>>>>>ridiculously inflated in price).
>>>>>
>>>>>> I remember sometimes I used to fall asleep
>>>>>>during some particular boring seminar -- coming awake as my
>>>>>>elbow slipped of
>>>>>>the desk and damned near hitting the floor and, of course,
>>>>>>EVERYONE took
>>>>>>notice. Long nights at the bar quaffing brew and a class
>>>>>>immediately after
>>>>>>lunch made staying awake nearly impossible.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hell, that was 30+ years ago!
>>>>>
>>>>>You must be about 10 years older than me, then.
>>>>>
>>>>>>My latest Simon order ought to be here today. I hope. As well as the
>>>>>>Bieler book I loaned Tom and he finally got around to returning. I am
>>>>>>anxious to key out my Archie specimens.
>>>>>
>>>>>I don't have enough to need Bieler to ID them, though the book's
>>>>>there if I ever get the urge to pig-out on archis. I just scored
>>>>>a major windfall of literature. My professor/colleague/friend
>>>>>Doug Campbell, NZ's Dr Triassic/Jurassic and also Dr Spiriferoid
>>>>>Brachiopod, died last year. His son Hamish, also a
>>>>>paleontologist, is here now sorting Doug's stuff. He has passed
>>>>>most of Doug's paleo literature my way... lots of material on
>>>>>Triassic ammonoids etc. Boxes full. And I still have his reprint
>>>>>collection and journals to go through.
>>>>>
>>>>>>So geversianus pile up by the thousands -- who do we know in that neck of
>>>>>>the woods who can collect for us? Actually I have been aware
>>>>>>for some years
>>>>>>that Trophon geversianus and related "species" were fully as plentiful in
>>>>>>their locales as out several Nucella species are here. But why
>>>>>>the prices
>>>>>>remain so high for the former is beyond me. Good marketing, I suppose.
>>>>>
>>>>>I think they rely on the remoteness of the occurrences. If more
>>>>>folk could get down there the value would drop to zero.
>>>>>
>>>>>>Trophon geversianus is the type species for Trophon --
>>>>>>monotypic? Not sure. Northern species are pretty variable too.
>>
>>
>>Had to remove a few bits...
>>
>>
>>--
>>Regards
>>Andrew
|
