CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Geoff Macaulay <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 9 Jul 2002 12:54:59 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
Any shell can make you feel good but is ones collection ever complete?
Geoff


>From: William Corey <[log in to unmask]>
>Reply-To: Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Must Have Shells
>Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 22:47:51 EDT
>
>Greetings to All,
>         Recently, coffee cup in hand, I was admiring some of my shells.
>As I
>was gazing rather fondly at them I wondered "What compels people to collect
>particular shells?"  I thought I would like to convene a virtual summit and
>ask the question this way:
>
>            As you have been building your collections have you ever
>thought:....What would be your "Canon" or closed list of must have
>specimens.
>  For example, as a collector of Cones (or cowries or whatever), what must
>you
>have to feel you have a "good" or "complete" collection.  Of course it is a
>matter of personal taste, but I am curious if there is a consensus among
>the
>collectors in this readership:
>
>       Of the kinds of specimens you collect, what must you have? Or, to
>put
>it another way: Which specimens do you feel should be in every "good"
>collection?
>
>                                    Thanks, in advance, for your opinions




_________________________________________________________________
Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
http://www.hotmail.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2