 
| Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii |
| Sender: |
|
| Subject: |
|
| From: |
|
| Date: |
Tue, 23 Jul 2002 23:30:41 +1200 |
| In-Reply-To: |
<001401c231c8$5d8c6f20$465ccc97@w0p6h7> |
| MIME-version: |
1.0 |
| Reply-To: |
|
| Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Is there a proper format to a systematic list of species??
>Some authors place alphabetically, others do not seem to have a
>format Besides being curious, have an involved project.
>
>Harry
A taxonomic list should be in taxonomic order (d'oh!) down to
familial level. Below that it is most convenient to arrange taxa
alphabetically (as in Vaught 1989), with species listed under genera
(or, if used, under subgenera).
--
Andrew Grebneff
165 Evans St, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand
<[log in to unmask]>
Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut
|
|
|
