Content-type: |
text/plain; format=flowed; charset=us-ascii |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 22:41:28 +1300 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
MIME-version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>Andrew Grebneff wrote:
>>
>> > The generic unit Triplofusus is based on Pleuroploca gigantea.
>> > Splitters consider Pleuroploca only to refer to Pleuroploca
>> > trapezium and a few other (Indo-Pacic) species. All these are in
>> > the Fasciolariidae.
>> >
>> > I think we'll eventually use Triplofusus for the Florida Horseconch,
>> > but change comes slowly.
>
>(snip)
>
>Am I the only one that finds it mildly amusing that, while the
>taxonomists argue whether it is Pleoroploca or Triplofusus or
>Hotglockomorra, the ol' Florida horse conch is still a Florida horse
>conch?
But it's NOT a conch (conchs are strombids). It doesn't live only in
Florida. And what does it have to do with a horse, apart from
being... er ... large?
--
Andrew Grebneff
165 Evans St, Dunedin 9001, New Zealand
<[log in to unmask]>
Seashell, Macintosh, VW/Toyota van nut
|
|
|