CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
John Wolff <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Oct 2003 08:53:14 -0400
In-Reply-To:
<a0600200abbb167627161@[203.167.170.119]>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
>  Actually all of the synonyms are valid names, though it is inappropriate
> to use all but the oldest... which is pumicea. There are currently set
> rules for this kind of thing, though I know that these are going to
> change (for the worse, unfortunately).

Andrew has touched on a separate issue that has always bothered me. Using
this definition of VALID name means you have to know all the synonyms that
pertain to a species, some numbering into the dozens. This complicates an
already unmanageable situation beyond all necessity. What do we call the
single currently CORRECT or APPROPRIATE or TRUE name of a species?

John Wolff
Lancaster, PA

ATOM RSS1 RSS2