CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Andrew Dickson <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 14 Jul 1998 23:20:43 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Dear Mark,
 
  I'm back on Conch-L for a little while.
  As far as I am concerned the two shells, C. floridanus and C. burryae
are not different species.  I used to find both of them at Harry Harris
Park, Tavernier Key and examples between to two.  The Johnsonia 1, No. 6
has the description of the types and compares it to C. floridanus
floridensis.
  I used to think the subspecies C. floridanus floridensis was actually
a valid species.  Until I saw some specimens from the lower Florida Keys
that looked like hybrids between the C. floridanus and C. floridensis.
  I suppose any area may potentially yield shells which have relatively
minor differences compared to similar representatives in adjacent or
nearby areas.  This seems to be phenomenon of certain Cones and some
other Molluskan species.
  I think its interesting that some other Genera such as Turridae, do
not vary much from place to place.
 
Andrew Dickson
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2