Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2004 20:09:18 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="none" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Just one question: if Nerita punctata Karsten, 1789 is transferred to
> Naticarius, then it is no longer a homonym of Nerita punctata 0.F.Müller,
> 1776, so Naticarius punctatus (Karsten, 1789) would turn out to be a junior
> synonym of Naticarius stercusmuscarum (Gmelin, 1791)? Even if this is the
> case, the current Code of Zoological Nomenclature strives NOT to change
> current widespread usage in favor of byzarre resurrected names -this is
> done through reversal of precedence. Any opinions?
If both were originally proposed in Nerita, then Karsten's species is a primary homonym of Nerita puntata Mueller and thus is permanently invalid. Only secondary homonyms (e.g., if Karsten had described it under a different genus from Mueller, but later authors put them both in Nerita) can be revived by a change in classification.
Dr. David Campbell
Old Seashells
University of Alabama
Biodiversity & Systematics
Dept. Biological Sciences
Box 870345
Tuscaloosa, AL 35487-0345 USA
[log in to unmask]
That is Uncle Joe, taken in the masonic regalia of a Grand Exalted Periwinkle of the Mystic Order of Whelks-P.G. Wodehouse, Romance at Droitgate Spa
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|
|