CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 13 Dec 2005 08:14:02 +1000
Reply-To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
In-Reply-To:
<11900198.1134415153242.JavaMail.root@webmail5>
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From:
Bob Abela <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (89 lines)
Hello all,

A couple of questions for everyone.
Does gem imply that the specimen is live collected?
Personally, I think the answer should be no but a good friend of mine insists otherwise.
And, it does bring up the concern of an operculum. Must a gem specimen have one?

Cheers,
Bob Abela

-----Original Message-----
From: Conchologists List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 5:19 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Grading Sea Shells


Good fer Tom;
  Yes, you can find "Gems" on the beach. (Coquina, the occasional Olive) I have even found Gem Eps at low tide. The shell is so small, any flaws are hard to find.
  I belong to that fraternity that includes all forms of government i.e. If it aint broke---fix it anyway!.
     Art
--
PLEASE NOTE: My new, long-term, and correct email address is: [log in to unmask] Please update your records!

---- Tom Eichhorst <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Jim and others,
>
> I applaud you on trying to ignite something, but I believe we are
> beating a dead horse.  Shell grading is, after all is said and done,
> subjective. Applying hard numbers; whether 1-10, 0-100, or
> good-fair-gem with half-step pluses and minuses is, to quote an old
> and horrible phrase, "like nailing jell-o to the wall" - just won't
> work.  The present system, if limited to good, fair, and gem with
> pluses and minus (singles only, please), leaves us 8 categories, or
> 3-10 of Jim's system (and would 1 or 2 ever really be used?).
> Actually, as I can't see using a plus or minus with "good," I guess it
> leaves us with six categories.  Still, this ought to be sufficient
> with such a subjective enterprise.  If we all adhere to as firm a
> standard as possible within this system, i.e.
>
> gem = mature with NO flaws;
> gem- = a minor flaw not readily discernable;
> fine+ = a discernable minor flaw or two,
> fine = a readily apparent flaw or two or a filed lip
> fine- = large "reef scar," other evident flaws, broken spire, filed
> lip; good = beached, worn with faded colors, major flaws;
>
> poor = I had to add this as I have a couple of shells that are closer
> to rocks than shells.  I have a Cypraea valentia that I paid $10 for
> (I just had to see what a $10 C. valentia would look like).  Whatever
> you think, it is worse.
>
> Anyway, using this system (with none of this "gem for the species
> nonsense), I have very few gem shells.  Gem seems mostly limited to
> Cypraea and Marginella.  The species in most other genera always seem
> to have one or two minor flaws; a tiny chip, surface scratch, etc.,
> thus F+.  I have seen only a couple of gem cones.  If you pick up a
> mature naticid or turrid and cannot SEE a flaw, than it is genuinely a
> gem.  If you can find a minor flaw under magnification, then gem-,
> etc.
>
> I find that when an established shell dealer says a shell is gem or
> fine+, I know what to expect.  It is kind of a gestalt process, and
> while far from a perfect system, it does seem that we all (globally)
> pretty much understand it.  That alone is worth something.
>
> Tom Eichhorst
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> [log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on
> molluscs To leave this list, click on the following web link:
> http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
> Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and click
> leave the list.
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs To leave this list, click on the following web link: http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2