CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Sender:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Richard Parker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 2 Dec 2006 19:53:05 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
These images are truly extraordinary.

- the shells that don´t fluoresce (the two bivalves from the same set) are
perhaps the most puzzling.
- the image showing the "lost" spots on a fossil cone is also fascinating -
 this should be a great help for identifying fossil cones.

Flowers are known to have different patterns in UV light to guide
pollinating insects who can see in that light range
see:
http://tinyurl.com/tlpyc

Perhaps short wavelength UV light penetrates further down than visible
light.

But I can´t think of any explanation for why so many shells (Conus and
Murex) from deep water have red or orange colouring (as do many deep water
fish)or why cones go to such trouble to make a beautiful pattern and then
cover it up with a periostracum.

regards
Richard

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2