Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Tue, 22 Sep 1998 10:17:33 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
A suggestion along these lines: set your browser to only download a
specific number of messages at a time and/or restrict the number of KB
you will accept in a message (50Kb is reasonable if you don't want large
attachments, or even less if you don't want any with attachments).
Sylvia
Stewart Jones wrote:
>
> Got a question. A downloading charge of $6.00 an hour seems like a lot, but
> I downloaded 15 messages today in 30 seconds and 30+ yesterday in less than
> a minute. That translates into 5 or 10 cents a shot, which isn't all that
> much. I imagine if you downloaded 2 or 3 times a week the cost-per-message
> would be even less. Granted, this costs a lot more than downloading for
> free, but it doesn't seem that expensive either. Am I missing something?
>
> Another comment. The greatest offenders (in cluttering up our email) are
> those who send personal messages, meant for one person, to our entire list.
> I'll bet they outnumber the off-subject messages by 5 or 10 to one. Even
> so, it's easy enough to scan subject titles and scrap the ones you don't
> want to read. I doubt if any of us read ALL the messages. Some folks just
> aren't interested in Caribbean shelling sites or Spondylidae--even if they
> are shell-related..
>
> sj
|
|
|