CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Don Barclay <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 1 Dec 1998 22:05:43 -1100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (13 lines)
Yep.  I have a smallish tridacna squamosa that is 48mm
thick at the top of the arc, and thicker at the back.  Not
counting the flutes.  And it's only about 450mm wide.  I'm
sure gigas gets a lot thicker.
 
----------
> From: Paul Monfils <[log in to unmask]>
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Thick shells -Reply
> Date: Tuesday, December 01, 1998 11:28 AM
>
> TRIDACNA GIGAS :-)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2