CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date:
Mon, 9 Feb 2015 14:16:00 +0000
Reply-To:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
Subject:
From:
"Callomon,Paul" <[log in to unmask]>
MIME-Version:
1.0
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Conchologists List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (167 lines)
We do indeed have that specimen. It was filed under Olivella fortunei (ANSP and lurking among about a dozen others, but it matches the figure well and was collected by Stearns. It will be passed on to our Type Imaging Project manager for processing, so should be visible on the web shortly. There are several paratype lots too, as the only qualification for that status is that they have been collected by Stearns and seen by Pilsbry.


Paul Callomon
Collection Manager, Malacology, Invertebrate Paleontology and General Invertebrates

Academy of Natural Sciences of Drexel University, Philadelphia
1900 Benjamin Franklin Parkway, Philadelphia PA 19103-1195, USA
[log in to unmask] Tel 215-405-5096 - Fax 215-299-1170



-----Original Message-----
From: Conchologists List [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Ron G. Noseworthy
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2015 8:44 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [CONCH-L] Correct Date (Olivella japonica)

Dear Harry,

Thank you so much for your detailed comments on the taxonomy of Olivella japonica and the links that you provided.  They are very helpful. I have used Clench and Turners's work on Pilsbry's names and was somewhat surprised when they missed O. japonica.  I still have no idea why some researchers use 1910 as the date of publication for this name.  

Thanks also for pointing me to this interesting comment on Arthur Adams' descriptive ability.  In the Manual of Conchology Pilsbry also includes several rather sarcastic references to the quality of Adams' descriptions.

Perhaps Paul can enlighten us on the possibility that one or more of the "fortunei" specimens at the ANSP may be type material.

All the best from Jeju Island!
Ron



--------------------------------------------
On Sun, 2/8/15, Harry Lee <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

 Subject: Re: [CONCH-L] Correct Date (Olivella japonica)
 To: [log in to unmask]
 Received: Sunday, February 8, 2015, 6:04 AM
 
 
 Dear Ron,
 
 
 When I first responded I wasn't clear on the authorship  of the  Catalogue you cited. I now see that it is Pilsbry,  and I found the  original description of Olivella japonica Pilsbry,
 1895:
 
 
 "Olivella fortunei (Ad.) Marratt [sic; see  <  https://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?A2=ind0706D&L=CONCH-L&P=R4800&X=6F051FFD71B6701C8F&Y=hglee2%40mindspring.com
 >]. PI. II, fig. 11. Thes. Conch., IV, pi. 350, f. 422,  423. Marratt's  [sic] figures but poorly represent the magnificent specimens  procured  by Mr. Stearns. The large dark form shown in the figure may  be called  var. japonica Stearns."
 
 Now the problem changes a bit: how to deal with the  (Frederick, not  to be confused with the USNM's Dr. Robert Edward Carter)  Stearns  attribution? Stearns' participation in this opus was  made reasonably  clear in the preface (Pilsbry) and introduction (Stearns):
 he collected
 essentially all the material treated, had published a  catalogue of some  of the material (Stearns, 1891; no mention of any  Olivella  therein), and dissociated himself from the scientific  aspects of the  catalogue (" ... I beg to be considered only as an  amateur in  conchology, and the public will understand that whatever of  scientific  merit that this volume possesses, is due to my friend and  editor Prof.
 H.A. Pilsbry."). It seems that Stearns'
 scientific
 contribution (NB: he published it) to this work  amounted to little  more than occasional manuscript communications, e.g., a  label. Ergo, to  the extent that this taxon is regarded as a species-level  taxon (as  permitted by the Code), the short version is:
 Olivella
 japonica Pilsbry, 1895: 23
 <
 http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/77006#page/39/mode/1up>;
 pl. 2, fig. 11
 <
 http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/77006#page/215/mode/1up>.
 In the interest of fairness, I must report that Higo,  Callomon, and Goto
 (1999: 271) cite "Stearns in Pilsbry, 1895"
 as
 attribution for the nominal taxon, so you have a choice.
 
 
 I haven't been at all tenacious in delving much deeper  here, but since  Higo, Callomon, and Goto (2001) didn't present a  photograph of a primary  type of Olivella fortunei var. japonica, I  tried to  determine the fate of such material. In the ANSP catalogue  database  <  http://clade.ansp.org/malacology/collections/search.php>,
 there
 are no hits for Olivella japonica, but under O.
 fortunei
 there are four lots in which Stearns received mention in the  chain of  ownership of Japanese specimen, two as collector and donor;  one as  collector only, and one as donor only. Could one or more be  type material  of our species? Paul C?
 
 
 Higo, S., P. Callomon, and Y. Goto, 1999. Catalogue and  bibliography  of the marine shell-bearing mollusca of Japan Gastropoda -  Bivalvia -  Polyplacophora - Scaphopoda. Elle Publications, Osaka.
 pp.
 1-749.
 
 Higo, S., P. Callomon, and Y. Goto, 2001. Catalogue and  bibliography  of the marine shell-bearing mollusca of Japan Gastropoda -  Bivalvia -  Polyplacophora - Scaphopoda. Type figures. Elle  Publications, Osaka.
 pp. 1-208, incl. numerous color figures.
 
 Stearns, F., 1891. A list of Mollusca and other forms of  marine life  collected in the years 1889-1890, in Japan. John F. Eby  and Co.,  Detroit. (1)-(20), pl. 1.
 <
 http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/60301#page/7/mode/1up>
 
 Pilsbry, H. A., 1895. Catalogue of the Marine Mollusks of  Japan, with  Descriptions of New Species, and Notes on Others Collected  by Frederick  Stearns. Detroit: F. Stearns, Detroit. (i)-viii +  "2'"
 [error pro 1]-196 + 11 pls.
 <
 http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/77006#page/9/mode/1up>
 [get a load of the author's assessment of Dr. Arthur  Adams' conchological  prowess at bottom of  <  http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/77006#page/11/mode/1up
 >]
 
 
 PS It seems that the Pilsbry biographers missed this  nomenclatorial act  even after a second try. Alan Kabat tells me it also escaped  Johnson and  Clench (2002). HGL
 
 
 At 08:28 AM 2/7/2015, Harry Lee wrote:
 
 Dear Ron,
 
 
 It looks like you've done due diligence on this one - as  usual.
 
 
 All I can say is that the name appears to have been proposed  in the 1895  work and is available under the provisions of the Code as of  that act (if  the same binomen hadn't previously been made available).
 I'm not certain
 how the Pilsbry attribution came into play, but the master  may have used  the name in ms only.
 
 
 Have you checked Johnson and Clench (2002) just to be sure?
 I don't have
 it anymore.
 
 
 Harry
 
 
 Clench, W.J. and R.D. Turner, 1962. New names introduced by  H. A. Pilsbry  in the Mollusca and Crustacea. Academy of Natural  Sciences,  Philadelphia. Special Publication 4: 1-218.
 
 <
 
 http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/item/28923>
 
 Johnson, R.I. and W.J. Clench, 2002. Additions and  corrections to  Clench and Turner, 1962, New names introduced by H.A.
 Pilsbry.
 Harvard University, Museum of Comparative Zoology,  Department of  Mollusks. 22 pp.
 
 
 
 
 At 07:10 AM 2/7/2015, Ron G. Noseworthy wrote:
 
 Hi, everyone!
 
 
 I need some help with the correct date for a species.  While working  on gastropod species described by Henry Pilsbry which occur  here on Jeju  Island, I encountered a problem with the correct date for  Olivella  japonica.  Some publications use 1895 as the date but  others use  1910.  The Catalogue of Marine Mollusks of Japan (1895)  contains  what appears to be the first reference to O. japonica as  "Olivella  fortunei var. japonica, and a figure is given.  I have been  unable  to find any 1910 publications by Pilsbry containing an  original  description of this species.
 
 
 Can someone enlighten me as to the correct date for O.
 japonica?
 Any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
 
 
 All the best from Korea! Ron
 Noseworthy
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------
 [log in to unmask]
 - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs  To leave this list, click on the following web link:
 http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
 Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and  click leave the list.
 ----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------
[log in to unmask] - a forum for informal discussions on molluscs
To leave this list, click on the following web link:
http://listserv.uga.edu/cgi-bin/wa?SUBED1=conch-l&A=1
Type your email address and name in the appropriate box and
click leave the list.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

ATOM RSS1 RSS2