CONCH-L Archives

Conchologists List

CONCH-L@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
ferreter <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:07:51 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Conchologists of America List <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
pray-tell what happened? I have been running "98" for about 6months now and
other then the usual computer glitches it runs fine . then again i run
thorough scan files scans that take about 1.4 hours each time , it finds and
repairs problems . See the main problem w/ ops programs is that each time
you(the programmer or code writer) write in a new feature it adds hundreds
of new "commands" , this increased the ;likely hood that you will have a
problem down the road , but w/out 3.1, 95 or 98 we would be writing and
operating our systems in "dos" . wouldn't that be exciting. just wait , win,
03 is going to use a whole new format , previews of it's functions are
exciting . good luck , mark bethke Hollywood, fl
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob and Carol Simpson <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Friday, February 26, 1999 1:21 AM
Subject: Re: Autosignature
 
 
>Mark must not have seen my warning about upgrading to Windows 98!!!  I have
>had to buy a new computer--and I'm not the first one this has happened to
>when I upgraded from 95 to 98.
>
>Carol Simpson
>Chapin, SC
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2